Environmental and Toxic Tort Defense Insight

News and Views on Environmental & Toxic Tort Federal and State Legal Issues and Developments

  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact

Connnecticut Court Orders Metadata Produced

By admin on February 29, 2012

Connecticut state courts have not provided a rule to address electronic discovery that would give guidance to litigants in a manner similar to the federal rules. In a significant decision, issued on November 18, 2011, the Hon. Barbara Brazzel-Massaro, who sits in Complex Litigation in Stamford Superior Court, ruled in Innis Arden Golf Club, Inc. v. O’Brien & Gere Engineers Inc., et al., that federal rules concerning electronic discovery may provide guidance that may be useful to Connecticut courts.

In this case, the defendant filed a motion to compel arguing that the electronic production of over 60,000 documents by the plaintiff did not provide an orderly or readable response. In particular, the defendant requested that the court order the plaintiff to re-produce the documents with accurate document separation, proper load files and pertinent metadata.

In granting the motion, the court held in pertinent part:

It is clear that the plaintiff produced the documents in mass without any designation as to which documents were responsive to which product request. The documents were not organized or indexed in a manner that would be sequential based upon the content but were simply given to the defendant to sort out. Even without considering the electronic difficulties, this manner of discovery is not sufficient. This type of discovery does not further the intent of discovery but only creates a stumbling block for the opposing party who has all of these documents and no where to go. The federal rules require that the documents are organized or labeled to correspond to the categories in the request. It is obvious that this was not done and has left the defendants with a mass of documents without a particular connection to the production requests.

The court ruled further that the plaintiff should produce electronic discovery in a load file with pertnent metadata, but with defendant bearing the $550 cost of creating the load file. Perhaps most importantly for litigants who may be involved in future electronic discovery disputes in Connecticut, the court held that “the metadata is an important source for the defendants as part of the orderly production of the electronic discovery.”  In so ruling, the court has created an expectation that ESI should be produced with metadata, which contains valuable information, and load files, which can expedite the organization on software of large productions. 

Filed under Connecticut Complex Litigation, document production, E-Discovery, Electronic Discovery, Hon. Barbara Brazzel-Massaro Tagged with 'Hon. Barbara Brazzel-Massaro' 'Connecticut Complex Litigation' metadata 'load files' 'electronic discovery' ESI 'e-discovery' 'document production'

Subscribe to this blog by email

Stay Connected

  • Follow Us on Twitter Follow Us on Twitter
  • Subscribe to this blog via RSS Subscribe to this blog via RSS
  • View Our LinkedIn Profile View Our LinkedIn Profile

Editors

  • Michael Pietrykowski
  • Don Willenburg

Archives

Recent Posts

  • California Changes Law: Pain and Suffering Survives the Deceased
  • Plaintiff Experts Can Now Change Stories between Deposition and Summary Judgment?
  • GRSM Attorneys Publish Article Urging Alternative Exposure Defense
  • Women’s Lunch at Perrin National Asbestos Litigation Conference
  • A Return to the Hotel California: Out of State Plaintiffs Must Bring Their Causation “Baggage” With Them

Address

Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
San Francisco
275 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.986.5900
Fax: 415.986.8054
www.grsm.com

About Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani – Your 50 State Partner®: As the only law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states, we deliver maximum value to our clients by combining the resources of a full-service national firm with the local knowledge of a regional firm. We provide comprehensive litigation and business transactions services to public and private companies ranging from start-ups to Fortune 500 corporations. Founded in 1974, Gordon & Rees is recognized among the fastest growing and largest law firms in the country.

Recent Posts

  • California Changes Law: Pain and Suffering Survives the Deceased
  • Plaintiff Experts Can Now Change Stories between Deposition and Summary Judgment?
  • GRSM Attorneys Publish Article Urging Alternative Exposure Defense
  • Women’s Lunch at Perrin National Asbestos Litigation Conference
  • A Return to the Hotel California: Out of State Plaintiffs Must Bring Their Causation “Baggage” With Them
Copyright © 2022, Gordon & Rees LLP. All Rights Reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER